AddThis Feed Button "Frequently Copied, Never Duplicated"

Saturday, December 18, 2010

The Case of a Sequestered Mind

11 Jan, 2011 -  The list of psychopharmaceutical chemicals forced on my mother included Zyprexa, Celexa, Neurontin, Depakote, and Ativan,  Mind you, my mother suffered a closed head injury in 2003 and developed expressive aphasia.  She was never evaluated by a neurologist as I requested, nor did she have rehab or speech therapy. The drug interaction profile will tell you that many of these are NOT supposed to be given together, and the research tells you that Zyprexa is not for Elders, especially women. My younger brother, a MetLife salesman, refused to act to create a more beneficial care plan for her.


Now, a new report has been issued regarding new findings that many "prescriptions for the top-selling class of drugs, known as atypical antipsychotic medications, lack strong evidence that the drugs will actually help" and they are costing billions and "serious effects as weight gain, diabetes and heart disease..."

Too late for my mother, but not too late for you.




December 18, 2010 - Please refer to this recent Natural Health News post: Drug Death FDA and YOU http://naturalhealthnews.blogspot.com/2010/12/drug-death-fda-and-you.html


Truth telling seems to be the Mode O'Day with WikiLeaks being front and center in the news. In some small way this is one of my WikiLeak-type stories -


Imagine losing your ability to communicate following a closed head injury.  Imagine knowing that excellent neurological care is locally available in your community but the person with Power of Attorney over your care refuses a family member’s request to take you there.
On the surface this sounds cruel at the very least.  In the depths of this many-year saga it is very ugly.
Just the other day I was working on some drug information for a client in my Health Forensics® program.
At the same time I was listening to a very good discussion of problems with health care in the US, especially drugs that kill about 300,000 people annually, and posted an informative article on the subject to my blog.
This topic is very important to me because a related event happened in my family.
Given the fact I grew up I a medical family I had a different involvement than this brother, younger by seven years.  I went in to the medical field; he is a commissioned salesperson for a major insurance company offering annuities and mutual funds.
Sometime early in 2003, although I have never been told the exact date, my mother suffered a closed head injury. From what information I was able to scout out there was no definitive proof whether my mother fell and hit her head or experienced a stroke.
This brother was given power of attorney as the youngest, so my mother explained. When my mother called me to tell me this both my youngest daughter and I expressed concerns.  We suggested someone outside the family would be best.
As PoA, my brother took more than three months to contact me to tell me about the event.  During this time he either sold or removed all of my mother’s belongings, or gave items to other family members.  He never asked me if there were things I wanted, or that my mother wanted me to have: there were. 
After a very brief sentence or two I was told that my mother was at the same place where she had been living since a year after my father died, except in the nursing home division.
Even though I was experiencing shock because of the way the information was manipulated, I managed to order flowers and sent a card to my mother.  I called the facility to and to further exasperate the situation, the so-called “nurse” had no idea my mother had a daughter, and there was no mention of me in any of my mother’s records.
I did however manage to get a list of the drugs being prescribed to my mother, and found out who the attending doctors were.
Now for the third shock wave!  The list of drugs was so egregious and inappropriate I could not grasp what was happening.  Other than this being the typical way nursing homes, even the “5 star” rated one like this place, do things.  I hoped I’d find otherwise.
I phoned the GP internist.  He was not used to being asked questions so he complained to my brother.
Then I phoned the psychiatrist (another red flag) to ask about the drugs he was prescribing, seven to be exact.  I asked how he was able to diagnose my mother’s condition if she was experiencing aphasia.  He could not answer yet gave a diagnosis of depression.  He also diagnosed leg pain but could not explain why he gave Neurontin to someone who could not tell him if she had this complaint. Neurontin causes garbled speech among its other wonderful side effects; are you thinking what I thought?

Aphasia is an acquired communication disorder that impairs a person's ability to process language, but does not affect intelligence. Aphasia impairs the ability to speak and understand others, and most people with aphasia experience difficulty reading and writing. An Aphasia Therapy Program is an intensive communication program designed to improve communications skills, reconnect with those around them and attain a greater quality of life.  Based on recent studies, individuals with aphasia greatly benefit from treatment provided intensively over a short period of time. http://www.aphasia.org/docs/Bill%20of%20Rights.pdf 
I still couldn’t figure out why my mother did not have a neurologist as her primary provider.  When asked of the Director of Nursing, she said, “She had an MRI in the hospital, so she must have had one”.  She added later in our discussion that “…you know how those people are after they have a head injury” after I asked who was supplying prescription drugs to the facility and had they provided a drug interaction profile on the drugs prescribed for my mother.  She never answered this line of questions.
I ran a drug interaction profile the next day and again was shocked, so I called a colleague at the FDA who was one of their top pharmacologists.  He specialized in psychiatric drugs.
Politely he said, “This combination would knock out a healthy 30 year old!” and went on to express his real concerns.
I passed this on to my brother and asked that he take her to the neurologist for a real evaluation and to see that she received proper care, including speech therapy. 
Even though for the last couple of years he rails that I was unwilling to collaborate, my brother refused to take my mother to one of the top neurologists in the country.  He refused!  His excuses were 1) he would have to pay for her transportation there (not more than 5 miles one way with a nurse to accompany her), and 2) the nurse told him he would have to move her if she came off the drugs.
Not too long after this my mother was taken to the hospital for hip surgery following a fall.  The nursing director told me my mother would never fall because she had a “lap buddy”. 
A “lap buddy” can be a restrain, which requires an order, and it is to help prevent falls.  Whatever form used on my mother obviously did not protect her from falling and fracturing her hip, forcing her to be hospitalized and undergo surgery.
Now on opiates for pain, on top of her other sedating drugs (often used for staff convenience) what might be next?
The facility stopped sending me the drug data after this event.  To this day I still do not know if the Zyprexa given to my mother caused her to become diabetic.  My brother ignored the warning for suicidal ideation associated with Celexa (he believed drugs were necessary because my mother “tried to jump out a window”).  He too ignored the information I sent him stating clearly that Zyprexa is not for use with elderly patients, especially elderly women, and is a known cause of diabetes.
My little brother sees me as a trouble maker.  I see him as the thief who stole my mother’s mind.
If this is trouble making then I’m happy to continue providing Health Forensics® to all of the people who depend on me to help them understand the problems and nutritional deficiencies caused by drugs.
There is much more to this story.  I may tell it in the future.

DECEMBER 17, 2010,
What Happens When the Elderly Are Prescribed Antidepressants?

By Katherine Hobson

When you’re taking a lot of prescription medications, as many older adults do, there’s the potential for trouble.
An analysis of Medicare claims for 39,512 patients newly prescribed an antidepressant finds within a year, about a quarter filled other prescriptions for different antidepressants or other drugs that raised their risk for a major interaction. About 36% filled prescriptions for drugs that could cause moderate interactions, and about 39% filled prescriptions for drugs that risked minor or no complications.
More than 30% of those potentially major interactions involved pain meds, notably tramadol and oxycodone, according to the study, which was led by researchers from Thomson Reuters and published in the American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.
The analysis also found that side effects can play a role in adherence; less than half of the Medicare enrollees who had documented side effects within a month of starting an antidepressant filled a second prescription for the drug. And about a fourth who had documented side effects ceased taking antidepressants altogether.
This is only a piece of the much bigger issue of how — and what — to prescribe to the elderly. A study published earlier this week in the Archives of Internal Medicine examined the safety of painkillers in older people and found that opioids raised the risk of adverse events compared to non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as ibuprofen. Here’s the WSJ story on the study.
In a JAMA commentary published in October, Jerry Avorn, of Harvard Medical School and Brigham & Women’s Hospital, calls medication use in older people “arguably the single most important health care intervention in the industrialized world.” He says the U.S. health-care system needs to change to address the issue, including a greater emphasis in medical education on prescribing to the elderly, better representation of older patients in clinical trials and more coordinated care.
Note:  Some years ago I had the wonderful experience of working with a chemist who had some 47 patents to his name.  I came to know him because my business had done some work at his home, and I later asked him to analyze a compound I was interested in manufacturing.  He had expressive aphasia resulting from a stroke.  With his cooperation, his wife’s help, and some ingenuity, we designed a program for him. He regained speech; something my brother never let my mother experience.


I've served in executive positions in nursing homes.  I understand the games that are played, especially when corporations look for profit over people.  I have been a whistleblower in several Federal Elder care fraud cases. A reason why I am unwilling to sell my soul for a paycheck as I felt was an issue at the Naples FL facility where my mother was sequestered for the last silenced six years of her life.


Neuroprotective Compounds

Friday, December 17, 2010

Chantix Still A Danger to Health

Several years ago I started alerting people to problems with Chantix, mainly because of the suicide risk associated with the drug.

It seems as if the problem with the drug continues to be newsworthy -
Quitting Smoking Can Be Dangerous to Your Health


Selections from Natural Health News 
Apr 30, 2009
A reader was looking for natural alternatives to Chantix/Champix, so I thought I'd provide some information based on methods I've suggested to people over the years that have been very helpful. I generally suggest that if you are a ...
Dec 16, 2010
The worst offender with the strongest association to uncontrollable, murderous violence--within days of ingesting the drug--is the smoking cessation drug, Chantix (varenicline), which increases dopamine: it ranks 18.0 in the ...
Feb 02, 2008
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said that after an analysis of cases of depression, suicidal thoughts and other unusual behavior in patients on the medication, the evidence appears stronger of an association with Chantix. ...
Jun 18, 2008
“His on-to-Wall-Street approach succeeded in rushing Chantix, Pfizer's stop smoking drug, varenicline, to market but a string of 2006 suicides and the violent death of Dallas musician Carter Albrecht leave many asking if that was such a
May 22, 2008
A US Food and Drug Administration spokeswoman said the agency was focusing on likely links between Chantix and neuropsychiatric side effects. This year, the FDA and Pfizer, which manufactures the drug, updated warnings on Chantix's ...

Good Day Sunshine

For as long as I can recall, at least two or three decades, I have been teaching people to take a 20 minute walk at noon, even on cloudy days, to get sun exposure to help maintain vitamin D levels.

Now you know that the "new guidance", like most health discoveries, is actually old data in a new wrapper.

This just happens to be one of the benefits of following a skilled and experienced health care practitioner and educator instead of a glossy on-line tabloid.  Here you get facts.


You can use our search function to read the many other articles we have posted on vitamin D and sunshine.


Vitamins  

New guidance on vitamin D recommends midday sunshine


 
New health advice recommends short spells in the sun - without suncream and in the middle of the day.
Seven organisations have issued joint advice on vitamin D, which the body gets from natural sunlight.
The nutrient keeps bones strong, and protects against conditions like osteoporosis.
The guidance was drawn up because it is thought fears about skin cancer have made people too cautious about being in the sun.
Cancer Research UK and the National Osteoporosis Society are among the bodies which agree that "little and frequent" spells in summer sunshine several times a week can benefit your health.
The experts now say it is fine to go outside in strong sun in the middle of the day, as long as you cover up or apply sunscreen before your skin goes red.
'Too negative'
A good diet and sensible sun exposure will be adequate for most people to minimise their cancer risk.” Professor Peter Johnson Cancer Research UK
Professor Rona Mackie, from the British Association of Dermatologists, said: "Total sun protection with high factor suncream on all the time is not ideal, in terms of vitamin D levels.
"Even Australia has changed its policy on this. They're now producing charts showing parts of Australia where sun protection may not be required during some parts of the year.
"Some of the messages about sun exposure have been too negative. UK summer sunshine isn't desperately strong. We don't have many days in the year when it is very intense.
"What's changed is that we're now saying that exposure of 10 to 15 minutes to the UK summer sun, without suncream, several times a week is probably a safe balance between adequate vitamin D levels and any risk of skin cancer."
Official government advice already recommends vitamin D supplements for pregnant women and children aged under five.
But the experts who wrote the joint statement say mothers often are not made aware of this recommendation. They suggest women consult their GP.
Winter levels of vitamin D can be helped by a break in the tropical sun - or by eating oily fish, liver and fortified margarine.
'Complex area' Cancer Research UK's chief clinician, Professor Peter Johnson, said: "A good diet and sensible sun exposure will be adequate for the great majority of the UK population to minimise their cancer risk.
"The area of vitamin D and cancer is complex.
"There's some evidence, which is strongest in bowel cancer, that low levels of vitamin D in the blood correlate with the risk of developing cancer.
"But that doesn't mean those low levels cause bowel cancer.
"We think overall that low levels of vitamin D are unlikely to be major contributors to the chances of developing cancer in the UK population."
The joint statement also highlighted questions about vitamin D that warrant further research.
These include finding out the optimal levels of vitamin D, and more detail about the role of dietary sources and supplements.

S510 Update: Dead for Now

BREAKING NEWS - THE FOOD SAFETY BILL DIES WITH THE SPENDING BILL
           The Senate was taking up the House Omnibus Spending bill for 2011 (H.R.3082); but because the Republicans were insisting that the Senate clerks read the entire 1,924-page, $1.4 trillion spending bill paragraph by paragraph – which would have taken 50 hours to read out loud – Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has just decided late today to yank the bill (including S.510 within it).  In its place, the Senate may actually adopt Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-KY) idea of passing a one-page spending bill as a temporary, two-month stop-gap.
           However, it is too early to celebrate, so keep the pressure on to make sure that S.510, the so-called Food Safety bill, is not included in any substitute spending bill.  The Congressional leadership is working on a Continuing Resolution (CR) to fund the Federal government at this year's level.  However, even though S.510 is also dead as amendment to the Omnibus bill, it is not yet known whether it will be added to the to-be-completed CR.
           Keep in mind that this will have to be passed by the House of Representatives as well.  So, process wise, it could well be a round of "ping-pong" with the CR.  The clock is ticking as this “lame duck” session comes to an end and still has many matters yet to deal with.
           So, while we know that S.510 has been withdrawn along with the Omnibus bill, it is not clear if it is completely dead.  Our NHF lobbyist’s instinct says that it is dead for this Congress.  Let’s hope he is correct.
           Stay alert and stay tuned to new developments.  S.510 may yet stay dead in its fresh grave, a death it fully deserves.
SOURCE

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Drug Death, the FDA, and You

UPDATE: 13 June - Doctor, Hold Those Drugs

(Reuters Health) - U.S. doctors are too quick to reach for their prescription pads, according to a new report urging them to think more about side effects and non-drug alternatives.
"Instead of the latest and greatest, we want fewer and more time-tested drugs," said Dr. Gordon Schiff, associate director of the Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, a non-profit organization that studies ways to improve safe practices in healthcare.
"We are really trying to promote a different way of thinking about practicing," added Schiff, whose report appears in the Archives of Internal Medicine.
Nearly half of all Americans have used at least one prescription drug in the past month, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and experts say overprescribing is rampant.
By definition, that means people are being exposed to side effects, sometimes fatal, without the benefits that would justify those risks.
"Often what is really bothering them is not cured with a pill, but rather through exercise, physical therapy, or diet changes," Schiff told Reuters Health.
Yet many doctors are quick to prescribe a drug, partly because they have limited time to deal with individual patients or because they and their patients have been bombarded with ads from the pharmaceutical industry.
As for prevention and non-drug alternatives, Schiff said, "there are no drug reps coming to my office pushing that."
In an editorial in the same journal, researchers describe how opioid painkillers like Vicodin and Percocet have become increasingly common without good evidence that they help patients in the long run.
The evidence of harm, on the other hand, is clear, write Dr. Deborah Grady of the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleagues.
In 2007 alone, for instance, there were nearly 11,500 deaths related to prescription opioids -- "a number greater than that of the combination of deaths from heroin and cocaine," according to the researchers.
Some four million prescriptions for long-acting opioids are written every year, with side effects ranging from addiction to constipation to sleepiness.
To counter some of this overprescribing, Schiff and colleagues urge doctors to think beyond drugs and to prescribe new ones much more cautiously.
When it first hits the market, new medicine has usually only been tested in a few thousand patients, often healthier and younger than the ones doctors see in their offices.
That leaves a lot of questions about safety, especially since patients often are taking several drugs at the same time. More than a third of people over 60 take five or more drugs, for instance, and the number of prescriptions continues to rise.
But Dr. Lisa Schwartz and her husband Dr. Steven Woloshin, both of Dartmouth Medical School in Hanover, New Hampshire, told Reuters Health it's difficult for doctors to get unbiased information about new drugs.
"We need to be making this information much more easily accessible to doctors," said Schwartz, an expert in risk communication. "There are billions of dollars being spent on new drugs with unproven benefits."
Schwartz and Woloshin said one way to do this would be to have the U.S. Food and Drugs Administration, which approves new drugs, send out simple summaries about the medications.
They also emphasized that overprescribing, while real, goes hand in hand with underprescribing of drugs to high-risk patients.
"We have both problems in this country," Schwartz told Reuters Health.
According to Schiff, patients also have a role to play.
"Patients need to ask critical and skeptical questions, too," he said. "They really should learn about the side effects of the drugs they are taking and be on the lookout for them."
Schiff's "Principles of Conservative Prescribing" study was funded by government grants supporting consumer healthcare education and healthcare quality research.
SOURCE: bit.ly/lwuNm0 Archives of Internal Medicine, June 13, 2011.

UPDATE:  Since most of the major pharmaceutical companies are global, it may be that FDA is overlooking offshore study problems in their FastTrack pay-for-approval process Foreign Drug Trials: A Challenge to FDA 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Rense and Jonathan Emord  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNuYSqK7pVU06/13/11

12/16/10 In his important interview with George Noory, Washington attorney Jonathan Emord talked about the approximately 300,000 deaths annually from FDA approved and properly prescribed drugs.
Noory's web site states the issues of "conflict of interests found within the FDA and their history with hiding the negative aspects of prescription drugs as well as the benefits of natural remedies. Additionally, he also talked about his research into unmanned military technology. "The agency is a captive of the drug industry, unfortunately," Emord lamented about the FDA, "that has caused it to be a broken agency. It approves unsafe drugs, knowingly." To illustrate his point, he detailed the saga of the drug Avandia, where reviewers inside the FDA repeatedly warned of dangerous side effects but were continually dismissed by their superiors. He cited one reviewer who was told by his superior in the agency that the FDA "had to maintain good relations with the drug companies because they are our customers."
Emord asserted that 15 to 20% of prescription drugs on the market today are "so obviously unsafe as to warrant their removal from the market." He explained that these are newer drugs, aggressively pushed into the marketplace by pharmaceutical companies in order to replace older and safer drugs whose patents had expired. According to Emord, the effect of this dangerous favoring of profit over safety has resulted in "over 290,000 deaths a year from the proper use of drugs prescribed by doctors." Compounding the problem, he said, the FDA is so beholden to the pharmaceutical industry that it also aggressively "forbids any statement that a nutrient treats a disease" whether there is proof or not. The simple reason for this, he said, is because if people started using nutrients to improve their wellness, then they would no longer need to turn to the drugs sold by pharmaceutical companies."
Now today, to further the discussion the FDA calls out more problematic supplements because "These tainted products can cause serious adverse effects, including strokes, organ failure, and death," said FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg. "The manufacturers selling these tainted products are operating outside the law."

Of course I have yet to hear Hamburg make the same statements about and pharmaceutical drug that we know causes "serious adverse effects, ...strokes, organ failure, and death."  I'm sure you have not heard this either.

And now today, the Alliance for Human Research Protection sends this gem based on a report from PLoS

If you aren't telling your representatives and senators to stop the PhRMA payola, you should consider it now, after reading this important information.
31 Prescription Drugs Linked to 387 Homicides


Wednesday, 15 December 2010
"Prescription Drugs Associated with Reports of Violence Towards Others, " identifies 31 drugs linked to 1,527 acts of violence...
After two decades of contentious denials about the suicidal risk posed by certain psychoactive prescription drugs, numerous drugs now carry label warnings about suicidal behavior.
Now, a new study in PLoS One , identifies 31 drugs in FDA's MedWatch adverse drug reports that are disproportionately linked to 1,527 acts of violence--defined as "Homicide," "Physical assault," "Physical abuse," "Homicidal ideation" or "Violence-related symptom."
The violence events in these widely prescribed drugs--for diverse patient populations--were reported to the FDA between 2004 and Sept. 2009.
The authors, Thomas J. Moore, Joseph Glenmullen, MD Curt D. Furberg, MD, identified 1,937 reports of violence submitted to FDA's MedWatch that met a restrictive criteria:

The violence cases included 387 reports of homicide, 404 physical assaults, 27 cases indicating physical abuse, 896 homicidal ideation reports, and 223 cases described as violence-related symptoms. The patients were 41% female and 59% male with a mean age of 36 years 
(SD=17.9)
Of all currently marketed prescription drugs, those linked to most of the violent events reported to the FDA are drugs that increase dopamine and /or serotonin in the brain-- irrespective of the patient population.
The worst offender with the strongest association to uncontrollable, murderous violence--within days of ingesting the drug--is the smoking cessation drug, Chantix (varenicline), which increases dopamine: it ranks 18.0 in the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) with 408 cases of violence--including murder.  There are two other smoking cessation drugs that do NOT pose serious risks of violence.
The next drugs most often linked to unprovoked violent outbursts--some resulting in murder--are 11 of 13 SSRI antidepressants. These not so, "magic bullets," whose mode of action (reuptake inhibition) increases serotonin, were involved in 578 cases of violence.
Two drugs within the SSRI class--Prozac and Paxil--have been linked to the greatest number of reported cases of violence toward others: Prozac ranks 10.9 in the PRR, with 72 reported cases of violence, and Paxil (Paroxetine) ranks 10.2 in PRR, with 177 reported cases of violence.
The authors note that there was no signal for violence linked to mood stabilizers such as valproic acid, carbamazepine, and phenytoin, even though these drugs are commonly used in bipolar patients who may experience psychosis in the acute manic phase and therefore be more prone to violence. On the other hand, SSRI's, which are clearly linked to violent actions in patients with no history of violent behavior, are being prescribed for patients with bipolar disorder. That is a prescription for disaster.
The other class of drugs that are demonstrably linked to violence are 3 drugs prescribed for ADHD--amphetamines, atomoxetine and methylphenidate--and 5 hypnotic /sedatives.
Only 0.25% of all serious adverse drug events met the PLoS study's restrictive criteria of violence. Thus, it is likely that the number of cases included in the analysis is understated.
Not only does the FDA disregard the precautionary principle of medicine--"First, do no harm"-- the agency is unleashing drugs whose mode of action--accelerating dopamine and or serotonin in the brain--poses serious threats of violence to bystanders in the community!  Think of the school shootings....the postal shootings...the troop "friendly fire" deaths...
Read the complete article at PLoS One , "an interactive, open-access journal for the communication of all peer-reviewed scientific and medical research,"
"For the triumph of evil it is only necessary for good men to do nothing." Edmund Burke

In some earlier discussions, FDA hero Dr. David Graham points out more problems with "approved" pharmaceuticals and the danger they pose for your health if you are using them.


Selections from Natural Health News 

Jul 31, 2007
The people's hero, David Graham, MD, a drug safety officer at the FDA, called for Avandia's withdrawal. Dr. Graham estimated that its toxic effects on the heart had caused as many as 205000 heart attacks, strokes and death from 1999 to ...
Mar 02, 2005
David J. Graham, associate director of the Office of Drug Safety, testified about the toxicity of Vioxx and several other drugs before a Senate panel. He suggested that Bextra, Crestor (the cholesterol-lowering drug), Accutane (acne), ...
Jul 11, 2010
UPDATE: 15 July - FDA reviewer David Graham told the panel Avandia's risks were real enough "to put you in a hospital or a cemetery." Graham, who wants the pill banned, recently published an analysis estimating that as many as 100000
Aug 20, 2006
David Graham. Dr. Graham is the associate science director of the FDA's Office of Drug Safety and for several years now he's been an outspoken critic of the drug approval process at the FDA. In 2004, Dr. Graham testified before a Senate ...

Keep Safety In Mind with CFL Bulbs

December 2010 -  Of the numerous posts we have on Natural Health News about the risk and hazard of CFL light bulbs I chose to update this one to let you know that it has been agreed to reduce mercury levels in these toxic light bulbs.

What you aren't being told is that you can still get the regular, old-fashioned type light bulbs that have been improved to give you more light, for longer hours, and with better efficiency.

LED lights are improving, are now available in more formats, and cost is coming down.

We still vote for LED.


December 2007 - In Parliament (UK) a recent discussion was brought up in regard to the much advertised CFL light bulbs. What is never mentioned in all the advertising and promotion of these bulbs as a means to save energy is that they are a hazardous waste.

You might think it amusing to worry about disposal of these light bulbs, but you should think otherwise: CFL bulbs contain approximately 6 grams of mercury.


Parliament suggest 10 steps when removing and disposing of these bulbs including: Wearing a protective mask & gloves; placing the bulb in a sealed study box using tape; placing a damp cloth in the box, and taking the sealed box to a toxic waste disposal site.

Toxic mercury can be very harmful to health and may lead to development of neurological diseases.

You might want to look into LED or halogen bulbs as an option.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Lack of Federal Funding Cuts State Programs

Usually, the way I look at things is to see opportunity in defunding, in opposition to fear and negative over reaction.

I am a public health advocate but I support this so that you maintain your voice, and your choice, not the ram-policy-down-your-throat modality we usually get from the government folks, not matter what their level.

What this can do is strengthen your resolve to take back control of your health and how you look at how the health  care system works.  Nothing could be better!

Look to how well you can improve your dental health without water fluoridation.

Look at how well you can boost your immunity and stay healthy without vaccines.

Join with friends and neighbors to see how you can help and support each other, and those with needs greater than yours.

There are so many other options, and you CAN make the difference.

In the interim, don't fall prey to fear.
WASHINGTON, Dec. 15 (UPI) -- The economic crisis is threatening to erode progress state health departments have made in preparing for public health emergencies, U.S. researchers say.
Robert M. Pestronk, executive director of the National Association of County and City Health Officials, says the Trust for America's Health's annual report card on states' ability to respond to such emergencies warns that the decade of progress made since the Sept. 11, 2001, and anthrax tragedies is threatened by a lack of funding.
From January 2008 to December 2009, local health departments lost 23,000 jobs to layoffs and attrition, roughly 15 percent of the entire local health department workforce. In the second half of 2009, 13,000 local health department employees were subjected to reduced hours or mandatory furloughs.
"As the report reveals, under very challenging circumstances state and local health departments have made progress. Yet, this report highlights serious gaps in our nation's ability to respond to health crises, from outbreaks of infectious disease to natural disasters," Pestronk says in a statement. "Unfortunately, a lack of federal, state, and local budget resources is straining an already fragile public health system. Because the first response to any public health emergency is a local one, we are concerned the federal failure to sustain public health preparedness funding at the state and local level will jeopardize future response."

Prolific antipsychotic prescribers have industry ties

California Watch’s Christina Jewett compares a list of that state’s top antipsychotic prescribers reimbursed by state Medicaid (obtained through Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa) to ProPublica’s database of educational and speaking fees pharmaceutical companies have paid to doctors.
Not surprisingly, she finds matches. Of the top 10 prescribers, Jewett writes, “Three of them accepted $20,000 or more in educational or speaking fees from the company that makes the drug they prescribe to Medi-Cal patients.” Of those, the most remarkable are a duo who share an office near San Diego:
Samuel Etchie prescribed Seroquel more than 1,000 times in 2009 at a cost of $449,000 to the state, according to Medi-Cal records collected by the ProPublica news organization and provided to California Watch. The drug’s maker paid him $25,350 this year to speak to health professionals.
Etchie did not return two calls to his office.
John Allen, who shares an office with Etchie, was among the state’s top prescribers of Zyprexa, also an antipsychotic drug. Allen dispensed 418 prescriptions at a cost to the state of $346,569. This year and last, the drug’s maker, Eli Lilly and Co., paid him about $27,000 to educate other medical professionals.
The icing on the cake? A quote from Allen:
“I think it’s unfortunate that there’s an implication in articles that we’re robots for drug companies,” Allen said. “We have to have our own experience with medications and find out what works best. We’re not 5-year-olds in front of TV watching cereal and toy commercials.”

GNC may go to Chinese Ownership

If you are a GNC customer you may wish to consider this knowing what we know about the Chinese supplements sourcing issues and toxic ingredients.
A December 7 brief from Bloomberg says that Chinese food and dairy conglomerate BrightFood is looking to acquire supplement retailer GNC in a deal that could be cemented by the end of this year. Estimated at $2.5 billion to $3 billion, the potential acquisition, should it come to fruition, would represent the largest takeover of a U.S. business from a Chinese buyer ever, said Bloomberg.

Earlier this year, GNC inked a deal with Bright Food to start a joint venture, GNCChina, to sell supplement products to Chinese consumers. China ranks third—behind the United States and Japan—in consumer sales of supplements, according to NBJ research, with potential to become the largest in coming years. According to NBJ's 2010 Global Supplement & Nutrition Industry Report, Chinese supplement sales grew 9.3% in 2008, reaching $8.1 billion.

from Nutrition Business Journal that continues with their query...
Setting xenophobia aside, this story still leaves a sour taste. One is reminded of Dutch baby food firm Royal Numico and its purchase of GNC in 1999 for $2.5 billion. Failing to adequately mesh the retailer into its core business, Royal Numico ended up selling GNC to private equity firm ApolloManagement four years later for a dismal $750 million. GNC's owners might be better off focusing on updating the company's retail strategy rather than playing this global game of hot potato, especially when it seems to come down to choosing between the lesser of two evils. Which is better for the U.S. nutrition industry: American private equity or Chinese conglomerates?

TVA Coal Sludge and Health Risks

14 July 2011

House committee limits EPA ability to regulate coal ash

16 December, 2010 - Now, a problem with US manufactured dry wall in homes

UPDATE: 15 December, 2010 Federal failure on Chinese drywall
By Aaron Kessler and JOAQUIN SAPIEN, ProPublica

For the thousands of U.S. homeowners who are grappling with the financial and emotional trauma caused by defective Chinese drywall, one thing is now clear: The federal government is woefully unequipped to help them with a product defect as expensive and widespread as this one.

June 11, 2010: US drywall now contains toxic coal ash 

From 2007 Coal Ash Is More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste: Burning away all the pesky carbon and other impurities, coal power plants produce heaps of radiation

See also: Mold problems and flooding: Lessons to be learned from Katrina

UPDATE: 9 April, 2010 - Judge Awards Families $2.6M Over Chinese Drywall

UPDATE: 3 April, 2010 - Feds: Homes with Chinese drywall must be gutted

UPDATE: 24 June, 2009 -
Public Not Allowed to Know Location of Hazardous Coal Ash Sites
by Environmental News Service (ENS)
EPA Withholds Locations of 'High Hazard' Coal Ash Sites

WASHINGTON, DC - There are 44 coal combustion waste sites nationwide that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has identified as "high hazard," but the agency cannot make the locations of these hazardous sites public, Senator Barbara Boxer told reporters today. The California senator chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, which oversees the federal environmental agency.
Complete Article...

This item was originally posted in December, 2008. It is re-posted now because of the dry wall issue.
UPDATE: 8 May
'Stinky' Drywall Imported From China Raises Health And Safety Concerns

ScienceDaily (2009-05-07) -- Homeowners throughout the United States are complaining of stinky odors, copper pipe and wire corrosion, and respiratory problems in an ongoing crisis that officials say is linked to drywall imported from China. ... > read full article
UPDATE: 18 April -
Fla. to test air in homes with Chinese drywall
UPDATE: 14 April -
Coal sludge and health risks apply to dry wall from China.
Thank you to Scott Patterson for letting me post his comments. He is in the business of home inspection.
Toxic Chinese Drywall might be in your home!

Over the past few months, owners of newer homes nationwide have been complaining of drywall that smells like rotten eggs. In several cases, they have had to leave their home because the smell was so bad. In addition to the putrid smell, many homeowners have reported problems with air conditioning and other systems that are likely related to the defective Chinese drywall. This is being called the next EIFS like disaster in the real estate market!

Many have spent hundreds and even thousands of dollars - to have air conditioning, pipes and wiring repaired. Usually, drywall is manufactured in the United States, but a shortage between 2004 and 2006 prompted many builders to buy drywall from China.

Most of the reported problems stem from drywall imported from China during the construction boom years of 2004-2005. Florida and the Gulf Coast states have been the first to report and have issue with this drywall showing up but it also showing up in non-coastal areas.

Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin Co. Ltd. of China, a subsidiary of German-based manufacturer Knauf, is the company at the focus of these drywall problems. If your newer home smells like sulfur or rotten eggs, you may have defective Chinese drywall. The problem is coming from coal ash that was mixed into the gypsum drywall compound. It appears that China was attempting to get rid of their coal ash problems by mixing it with the drywall compound. When the drywall is exposed to moisture, such as high humidity a chemical reaction starts. The result of this reaction is the production of Hydrogen Sulfide and Sulfuric acid gas. This is the rotten egg smell that is present with the drywall.

This drywall is responsible for the destruction of the copper coils in HVAC units in the homes that it has been installed in. The corrosive off gassing is also responsible for damaging many other components in the homes from the copper electrical to the nails and screws that are holding everything together in the home.

If you think that you might have Chinese Drywall, you should contact a reputable home inspector who is familiar with this problem. If you need help locating an inspector just give me a call and I might know of a person in your area. As this new discovery is just starting to rear its ugly head, many are not aware of this problem. Call Scott Patterson at 615-302-113 if you have a problem or question.

The author of this informative notice is Scott Patterson. Scott is a nationally recognized home inspector who works out of the Nashville TN area and holds multiple state home inspector licenses. This may not be reproduced with out written permission from the author. Copyright 2009

See also -
Dusts From Drywall
Tainted Chinese Drywall
-------------------------------------------------------
UPDATE: 2 January, 2009 - The Christian Science Monitor has a very good article on this situation that points out the lax requirements dating back the the corporate influence in the Clinton Administration. Lax EPA regulations continued during the outgoing Bush regime. One issue similar to the Cataldo Mission toxic site is a waste repository being built with no liner. Obviously this is a major issue needing to be addressed by the newly elected administration.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The coal sludge ponds that failed, as reported in media reports recently, raise health issues. It is good to see that the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is planning to test the water in the area hit by this flood of waste. And certainly it seems as if the damage done to peoples homes and lives is being addressed.

I work with a group that is in community that has been the victim of mine waste for over 100 years. The information I develop for them on health is shared with other groups who are dealing with the impact of mining waste.

In the news stories there has been mention that the coal waste is radioactive. Coal waste also leaves arsenic in the water as well as the possibility for other heavy metal leaching.

TVA would be well advised to supply all those harmed in this tragedy with high quality vitamin C and iodine products. Additionally, a very specific product containing both vitamin C and specialized essences of garlic (equal to 35 cloves of the full spectrum of garlic's benefits) is appropriate.

Vitamin C is an excellent chelator and will help remove heavy metal waste from the body. Garlic is a heavy metal chelator as well and it offers other protective support for health. Iodine, such as Iosol or professional products like Prolamine Iodine, even adding the sea vegetables to one's diet, works to reduce the impact of radioactivity.

For more information on clean-up concerns please see Silver Valley Action.
Spill may have permanently altered Tenn. communityBy KRISTIN M. HALL, Associated Press Writer Kristin M. Hall, Associated Press Writer Tue Dec 30, 3:17 am ET

KINGSTON, Tenn. – A week after more than a billion gallons of coal ash broke through a retention pond dike and roared into a small river cove, the landscape has turned into a muddy pit that's little like the scenic spot that attracted people to live here.

The Emory River is clogged with giant chunks of gray ash sticking out of the water and trees ripped out by their roots and washed downstream during the Dec. 22 disaster. Ducks float in a film of sand-like residue on the surface. Dozens of pieces of heavy equipment are digging along the river to try to clean it of coal ash.

The Kingston Steam Plant, a coal-fired power plant operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority, sits on the confluence of two rivers, about 35 miles west of Knoxville.

The deluge destroyed three houses, displaced a dozen families and damaged 42 parcels of land, but there were no serious injuries.

There are 62 pieces of heavy machinery slowly gathering up the spilled ash from residential roads, railroad tracks and the river, plant manager Ron Hall said Monday.

But no one at TVA can say how long the cleanup will take and how thorough the restoration can be.

"It's almost like someone dying, because it's so permanent," said Crystell Flinn, whose home was swept away.

Hall said workers will pull the sludge out of the river using barges and skimmers, and dump trucks will carry it to a different site at the plant. But the material won't return to the large riverside retention ponds still there.

"We will not likely put in wet ash ponds again, even though they have shown to be structurally integral," TVA environmental executive Anda Ray said Monday. "We are looking at options for what to do long term for that ash disposal, but there are dry ash pond technologies."

In the days after the spill, officials are finding more reasons to be concerned about the possible harmful long-term effects. Federal officials on Monday cautioned residents who use private wells or springs to stop drinking the water.

But the area isn't densely populated, and TVA said that no more than four wells are in the spill area.

Samples taken near the spill slightly exceed drinking water standards for toxic substances, and arsenic in one sample was higher than the maximum level allowed for drinking water, according to a press release from TVA, the Environmental Protection Agency and other agencies.

Federal officials should have tests on the affected wells sometime this week.

"I think they (the wells) were beyond the actual slide point of the material," EPA spokeswoman Laura Niles said. "There shouldn't be direct impact, but that's why they are sampling."

Authorities have said the municipal water supply is safe to drink.

Arsenic occurs naturally in the environment, but elevated levels can cause ailments ranging from nausea to partial paralysis, and long-term exposure has been linked to several types of cancer, according to the EPA.

Ray said arsenic levels were high because of the type of measurement that the EPA used, which included soil mixed in with water.

"Those samples were not dissolved arsenic," Ray said. "The dissolved arsenic, which is what you look at for drinking water samples, are undetectable in all the cases. The elevated arsenic that the EPA is referring to is the data that we collected when it was stirred up. It is routinely filtered out through all water treatment plants."

Environmental concerns could shift when the sludge containing the fly ash, a fine powdery material, dries out. The EPA and TVA have begun air monitoring and on Monday advised people to avoid activities that could stir up dust, such as children or pets playing outside.

The dust can contain metals, including arsenic, that irritate the skin and can aggravate pre-existing conditions like asthma, Niles said.

The EPA recommends that anyone exposed to the dust should wash thoroughly with soap and water and wash the affected clothes separately from other garments.

Ray said TVA will start installing sprinkler systems in areas where the ash has dried out to keep it moist.

Knoxville-based TVA supplies electricity to Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, Kentucky, Georgia, North Carolina and Virginia.

Copyright © 2008 The Associated Press

Biochemic Help for Malaria

Cell Salts are homeopathic remedies that help many things.  They are one of my very favorite natural health care therapies.  The class I have taught for many years on this topic has always been one of the most popular offerings we have through our education division, The Oake Centre for natural health education.


In 1858 a medical 'discovery' moved many to focus on cellular health based on biochemistry, and so cell salt therapy was born.

Recently I was doing some research for a client and was reviewing my cell salt resources, when I fell upon something that could be very helpful in the effort to help people at risk for malaria, or those who have it.

The chances of reducing the risk of an attack is with the cell salt, Nat Sulph (sodium sulphate).  Nat Sulph is also the key nutrient used in all facets of the disease.

Additional cell salts Calc Phos (calcium phosphate) can help with secondary anemia resulting from the disease.

Ferr Phos (iron phosphate) the oxygen supplying cell salt is very helpful when there is fever and vomiting of undigested food.

Cell salts are inexpensive and in most chronic situations the 6X dilution is used.
graphic source

Selections from Natural Health News
Natural Health News: Malaria Effort Not Working
Oct 29, 2010
The herb, artemisinin, or sweet wormwood, is an ancient Chinese medicinal herb already commonly used to treat malaria worldwide. Because its effect in the body is relatively brief, it is often used in a pharmaceutical combination with . ...
Jul 08, 2010
The herb, artemisinin, or sweet wormwood, is an ancient Chinese medicinal herb already commonly used to treat malaria worldwide. Because its effect in the body is relatively brief, it is often used in a pharmaceutical combination with ...
Dec 12, 2009
ABUJA (AFP) – A rise in insecticide resistant mosquitoes has become the latest threat to combating malaria in Nigeria, where roughly up to 300000 people die each year from the killer disease, experts have warned. ...
Feb 08, 2008
UPDATE: Stephen Fisher, a missionary in Zambia is very successful using iodine to treat people with malaria. He used 20 drops of Iodine in a half glass of water given 4 or 5 times during the first day and then decreased the dose to 10 ...

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

To Those Who Are On The Attack Against Supplements

I was looking for an image to use in an article  I am working on earlier today and literally stumbled upon an article against supplements with a very trendy, techy type chart.  

At the same time I literally stumbled upon a good article from an MDs magazine about using homeopathy for trigeminal neuralgia.
Resource 1
Resource 2
After perusing the homeopathic articles I went back to the chart and played around with it a little and discovered something quite interesting: The links go to articles that are limited in information toward supplements.

Hardly accurate, and hardly fair, at least in my book.  What a way to dis-inform people while using something beguiling to lure them in to a limited way of thinking about their health and what can improve it!

You have to be the judge, but my money will always be on the side of supplements for promoting and maintaining good health... 

Many of the supplements at the lower part of the chart have been used effectively over decades for positive health results.  It is difficult to overlay the biased type of studies relied on in mainstream medicine to show less than the already known benefits of vitamins, minerals, and herbs for health.  

If all these things were of no use or no benefit how is it that other than US cultures have relied on them for thousands of years, and even the medical system of pharmaceuticals in the US is based on these very things.


Take this as a jumping off point to learn about what you can do to protect and maintain your health.


And that's a fact, or my name isn't Edith Ann...

New Vitamin D RDA and Vitamin D Deficiency | pilladvised

Leo Galland, MD has had a long track record utilizing natural medicine. Here you can read comments from his blog on the IOM Vitamin D nonsense that we have addressed in other posts.

The Vitamin D test and quality vitamin D3 and D2 supplements are available from our parent organization, Creating Health Institute, http://leaflady.org

New Vitamin D RDA and Vitamin D Deficiency | pilladvised
Low Vitamin D and the Vitamin D deficiency symptoms that go with it can generally be avoided by eating Vitamin D enriched foods or taking supplements.

The latest controversy that has spun out of the new Vitamin D RDA announcement has caused some people to turn away from this important vitamin. But that could put them at risk of low Vitamin D and the Vitamin D Deficiency Symptoms that go along with that.

The Vitamin D Controversy

Newspaper headlines exclaim: “Extra Vitamin D and Calcium Aren’t Necessary, Report Says.” Or “Triple That Vitamin D Intake, Panel Prescribes.”

These dueling headlines are both based on the “Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D" report just released from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) setting new RDA’s for Vitamin D and calcium. Opposite descriptions of the same story, neither of them is an accurate reflection of the report’s conclusions.

It matters because people have told me they have already stopped taking Vitamin D supplements based upon what they have read in the news, which could mean higher chances of Vitamin D deficiency symptoms.

So I am telling you what I told them—Don’t believe the hype on Vitamin D.

Key Points from the IOM Report on Vitamin D

To begin with, the Vitamin D recommendations that come out of this thousand page report all hinge on one (and only one) number: the blood level of Vitamin D that is considered adequate. The committee set that number at 20 (specifically, 20 nanograms per milliliter). Many Vitamin D researchers have set that number at 32, which makes all the difference.

Vitamin D Deficiency Symptoms

Almost every scientist agrees that blood levels of Vitamin D under 20 are associated with poor health outcomes. Effects and symptoms of Vitamin D deficiency include increased mortality from all causes and increased risk of developing osteoporosis, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, heart disease, depression and several types of cancer. These are the serious drawbacks of having low Vitamin D.

In fact, the lower the Vitamin D levels fall below 20, the greater the risk of having symptoms of Vitamin D deficiency. Almost all scientists agree that when blood levels of Vitamin D are low, it’s easy to correct the deficiency and to raise the level of Vitamin D up to 20 with supplements.

New RDA’s for Vitamin D

The IOM panel concluded that a total intake of 600 IU/day Vitamin D from food and supplements would get most North Americans to a level of 20. They left sunlight out of the Vitamin D RDA equation because it is hard to measure someone’s sun exposure.

So, they increased the Vitamin D RDA for young adults from 200 to 600 IU/day and for older adults from 400 to 600 IU/day. For those over age 71 the Vitamin D RDA was raised to 800 IU/day.

No Epidemic of Vitamin D Deficiency

And because most North Americans presently have blood levels around 20, they stated that there is no epidemic of Vitamin D deficiency and most people don’t need to do anything to raise their blood levels higher. The IOM report is essentially saying that most people are already getting enough Vitamin D. The report triples the Vitamin D RDA, not because people aren’t meeting it, but because that is the amount that should get most people to a blood level of 20.

The IOM panel also expressed concern about much higher blood levels, because some studies have shown increased mortality or cancer rates among those with the highest Vitamin D levels (which could be anywhere from 40 to 100, depending upon the study).

But they also determined that these high levels were unlikely to be reached at intakes under 4000 IU/day, so they raised the tolerable (safe) upper limit for Vitamin D from 2000 IU/day to 4000 IU/day for adults and even stated in the body of the report that an intake of 10,000 IU/day was unlikely to cause harm. This “high” dose is less Vitamin D than most Americans would get from a summer day at the beach without sun block.

So what’s missing from these recommendations? First, almost all the studies show progressive health benefits as blood levels of Vitamin D go from under 10 to about 20. They also show additional health benefits as the levels go from 20 to 32 (and in some studies to 40 or more). The benefits associated with going from 20 to 40 are not as great as the benefits achieved by going from 10 to 20, but they are for the most part statistically significant.

Because it can be harder to get from 20 to 40 than from 0 to 20, much higher doses may be needed to get to the higher level. The IOM panel cautions that the health benefits of taking these higher doses of Vitamin D have not been well established.

The Research on Benefits of Higher Doses of Vitamin D

However, some placebo-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated benefits with high dose supplementation of Vitamin D that have not been seen with lower doses used in other studies:

  • A Japanese study found that children taking 1200 IU/day had a decrease in influenza during the winter (1)
  • A New Zealand study found that 4000 IU/day reduced insulin resistance (a precursor of diabetes) in Asian women, and the effect only occurred if the blood level rose to 32. (2)
  • A Norwegian study found that 20,000 to 40,000 IU/week given for one year reduced depression scores in overweight individuals. (3)
  • A clinical trial done at Creighton University in Nebraska found a 75% reduction in the incidence of cancer among post-menopausal women given 1100 IU Vitamin D per day for 4 years. The effect required blood levels greater than 32. (4)

The bottom line: the IOM report does not advise against Vitamin D supplementation and in fact raises both the recommended daily allowance and tolerable upper limits of Vitamin D.

An important observation, buried deep in the report, is that people with lower Vitamin D levels respond faster to supplementation and people with high levels at the end of summer have a steeper drop in their levels during the winter. It is important that you understand why this happens.

Vitamin D induces its own destruction. As Vitamin D levels go up, so does the activity of the enzyme that inactivates it and the activity of this enzyme stays elevated for several weeks after the Vitamin D levels drop. The result is that people taking higher doses of Vitamin D supplements may not have a predictable, stable increase in their Vitamin D levels, and people who get a lot of sun exposure in summer but take no supplements in winter may have a lower Vitamin D level in winter than people who don’t get a lot of summer sun. Winter sun north of the latitude of Atlanta, Georgia is too weak to generate much Vitamin D. People that take high doses of Vitamin D and then stop are also at risk for plummeting Vitamin D levels. (5)

The emerging research indicates that taking high doses of Vitamin D doesn’t guarantee an optimal blood level, but it’s the blood level that correlates with the benefits.

So, when it comes to Vitamin D, one size doesn’t fit all and supplementation should be based on individual needs.

References:

"Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D" November 30, 2010, A report by the Institute of Medicine, the health care arm of the National Academy of Sciences.

1) Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 May;91(5):1255-60. “Randomized trial of Vitamin D supplementation to prevent seasonal influenza A in school children.” Urashima M, Segawa T, Okazaki M, Kurihara M, Wada Y, Ida H.

2) Br J Nutr. 2010 Feb;103(4):549-55 “Vitamin D supplementation reduces insulin resistance in South Asian women living in New Zealand who are insulin resistant and Vitamin D deficient – a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.” von Hurst PR, Stonehouse W, Coad J.

3) Intern Med. 2008 Dec;264(6):599-609.“Effects of Vitamin D supplementation on symptoms of depression in overweight and obese subjects: randomized double blind trial.” Jorde R, Sneve M, Figenschau Y, Svartberg J, Waterloo K.J

4) Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jun;85(6):1586-91.“Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduces cancer risk: results of a randomized trial.” Lappe JM, Travers-Gustafson D, Davies KM, Recker RR, Heaney RP.

5) Anticancer Res. 2009 Sep;29(9):3675-84. How to optimize Vitamin D supplementation to prevent cancer, based on cellular adaptation and hydroxylase enzymology. Vieth R

NO to Forced Purchase of Health Insurance

While I am strongly committed to health care access for all as is available in most countries outside the US, I think this ruling is one to be strongly evaluated.

First of all why must insurance, especially in a plan largely written by the insurance and pharmaceutical industry be rammed down the throats of selected groups of people?

Secondly, most media outlets are not giving much coverage to the groups that are exempted from this proposal.  Members of Congress are excluded and to me this is the most flagrant abuse in the legislation.

There are other concerns too but I want to stick with an example of employment based insurance.

In an NPR report related to the court ruling there was a discussion of the "boomers" in age 50-64.  Right now many are unemployed, lacking coverage, and lacking employment opportunities because so many of the Republicans in Congress sent jobs from their political crony corporations out of the country, and for the most part are responsible for NAFTA and GATT.

A health policy instructor at a California university mentioned in the report that it is just the 50-64 age group that is at highest risk of developing chronic health conditions like the heart attack that left a 59 year old man with $94 thousand in debt.  He'd also been unemployed for 5 years.

This college instructor also mentioned that most chronic health conditions start appearing around age 64.

Certainly a better way to see this is to see that there is no inclusion of natural health options in the health insurance reform bill.

There is talk about "integrative" care but this model  has quickly become a copy cat of the AMA model, only the "prescriptions" are a bit different, but it is still a tightly controlled arena.  They want this limited to the few who have 'licensening'.

What you hear so little about is prevention and true natural therapies.

The traditional natural health care approach has been keeping people well for h undreds of years.  You can find out more here. We have been helping people be well and stay well in a toxic world for decades naturally and during the decades as a nurse practitioner.

Key healthcare provision voided by federal judge

A requirement that Americans buy insurance — the central provision of Obama's signature domestic achievement — is unconstitutional, the ruling says.


December 13, 2010
By Noam N. Levey and David G. Savage, Tribune Washington Bureau Reporting from Washington — Declaring a core part of the new healthcare law unconstitutional, a federal judge in Virginia has launched President Obama's signature domestic achievement into a gantlet of conservative-leaning courts that will almost certainly conclude at the Supreme Court just as the 2012 election is cresting.

In the first such decision since Obama signed the law in March, U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson ruled Monday that Congress had overstepped its power in requiring Americans to get health insurance by 2014.

Continue reading

More here

More Reports of Flu Drug Resistance

More flu viruses develop resistance to antiviral drugs

That news, from a study published online this week in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, underscores our reservations about inappropriate use of antiviral flu drugs. The researchers said that almost all of the strains of the H1N1 (swine) flu virus they looked at showed at least some resistance to the drugs oseltamivir (Tamiflu), though all still responded to the related medication zanamivir (Relenza). Previous research suggests that some other flu strains might also be developing resistance to those and other antiviral drugs.
Read the complete report here

Canadian Judge Rules Against Vaccine Mandate
Vaccinations aren’t “essential” medical treatments, a family court judge has ruled in refusing a Child Welfare request to order inoculations for four kids.
Judge Stephen Lipton, in a written decision released Thursday, said while the vaccinations are preferable, it wasn’t in his power to order them.
Child Welfare had applied for a ruling to have the siblings immunized despite their parents’ decision not to allow the treatment.
But Lipton said the four children, ranging in age from one to 12, weren’t at any present risk so no court intervention was warranted.
“I find that on the facts of this case the vaccinations proposed by the caseworker don’t fall within the definition of ‘essential’ (in the legislation),” Lipton said. “The children are healthy and none of them are at imminent risk of serious harm.”
Lipton noted the dangers of not getting immunized would expose the children to the risk of contracting illnesses which could cause brain injury or death.
The mother refused allowing vaccines for her children while the father suggested herbal medicines would be effective. Kevin Martin

Selections from Natural Health News

Natural Health News: Vitamin C or Tamiflu, which would you choose
Aug 08, 2009
Antiviral drugs, such as Tamiflu (oseltamivir), work by inhibiting something called neuraminidase, produced by viruses and essential for their ability to replicate. So too does vitamin C according to recent research. ...
Natural Health News: FLU VACCINE (Tamiflu) KILLS TWO TEENS
Nov 13, 2005
TOKYO - Two teenage boys who took the antiviral drug Tamiflu exhibited abnormal behavior that led to their deaths, with one jumping in front of an oncoming truck last year and the other falling from the ninth floor of a building earlier ...
Natural Health News: WARNING: Tamiflu and Relenza Hazards Reported
Nov 23, 2007
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Food and Drug Administration staffers are recommending new warnings about psychiatric events observed in some patients taking Roche Holding AG's Tamiflu and GlaxoSmithKline Plc's Relenza, according to ...
Natural Health News: Tamiflu dangers reported
Nov 29, 2006
"Health Canada has requested that the manufacturer ... update the Canadian prescribing information for Tamiflu to include this new information," the department said in a statement. According to Health Canada, there have been 84 reports ...