AddThis Feed Button "Frequently Copied, Never Duplicated"

Friday, January 06, 2012

FDA slow to take action on vaginal mesh

UPDATE: 24 January 2012
If you are experiencing problems because of mesh please consider
looking  to our colleague, Linda Kilpatrick, for more information and support, 

Dems call for Lap-Band, mesh probes ahead of MDUFMA re-authorization

Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives are calling for a congressional probe into a pair of high-profile medical device products – Lap-Bands and vaginal mesh – as Congress gears up for hearings and a vote on re-authorizing the Medical Device User Fee & Modernization Act.
Capitol Hill
Democrats in the U.S. House, concerned about a pair of high-profile medical devices, want the Energy & Commerce Committee to open a probe into gastric band and vaginal mesh products. SOURCE

US House of Representatives recently has been visiting my series of articles on surgical mesh.  Find them all using our search window.
5 January 2012
FDA wants new studies on surgical mesh

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. health regulators ordered new safety studies for surgical mesh implants that are used to hold pelvic organs in place, citing a spike in the number of complications seen for female patients, including erosion and infection.The Food and Drug Administration also said it may reclassify the devices in a higher-risk category that would require manufacturers, such as Boston Scientific and a unit of Johnson & Johnson, to conduct clinical trials in people before receiving approval for sale.
The companies could not be immediately reached for comment.
The devices, made of synthetic or biological material, are commonly implanted in women to repair weakened or damaged tissue and provide support in cases of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). They are also used to help those with a severe overactive bladder known as stress urinary incontinence.
The FDA said it received more than 1,500 reports of complications related to the repairs with mesh from 2008 to 2010, including cases in which the mesh eroded into the vagina or caused bleeding and infection. The rate of problems was five times the rate reported from 2005 to 2007.
The FDA sent letters this week to 35 manufacturers of transvaginal surgical mesh, requesting three-year studies of several hundred women each to study side effects, as well as the women's overall quality of life.
In July, the agency warned that complications with the mesh were "not rare" and that transvaginal organ repair using mesh may put patients at greater risk than other surgeries and treatments.
The FDA also said it was concerned about scientific studies that show a lack of clinical benefit from surgical mesh, compared to non-mesh repair.
About 75,000 women received mesh repairs for pelvic organ prolapse in 2010 and about 200,000 women received transvaginal repairs for stress urinary incontinence.
The agency is asking for more studies from companies that sell the mesh for POP surgery. In the case of mesh used to correct an overactive bladder, the FDA is seeking further study of use of a so-called "mini-sling," when strips of material are used around the bladder neck and the urethra.
During their lifetime, 30 percent to 50 percent of women may experience POP, with two percent developing symptoms. The condition happens when tissue that holds the pelvic organs in place becomes weak or stretched and bulges into the vagina.
Surgery to support prolapsing organs can be done through the abdomen or the vagina, either with stitches or also with surgical mesh for reinforcement.
Surgical mesh has been used since the 1950s to repair abdominal hernias, but doctors only started using the mesh for POP and stress urinary incontinence in the 1990s, a procedure that has grown in popularity.
Companies that wanted to make the mesh specifically for POP or urinary incontinence could submit their application under a 510(k) accelerated review application that did not require them to do clinical trials in people, as long as they could show their implants were similar to devices already on the market.
But during a panel meeting in September, outside advisers to the FDA recommended that the agency reclassify the devices for POP to require companies to submit additional studies. The FDA said it is considering their advice.
Jeffrey Grand, a lawyer at Bernstein Liebhard in New York, is representing women who are suing companies that make the transvaginal mesh, with a case going to trial later this year.
"These things were basically put on the market without any significant safety testing," Grand said. "I'm hoping that all of this brings about some regulatory changes."

In September 2011 the FDA convened a conference on the use of TV mesh and the consideration for changing its device classification to a more stringent one.

Now the FDA is calling for comments regarding its process of classifying its own process.  You can read more about this here... 

FDA Public Health Notification: Official 2008 warning from the FDA

Serious Complications Associated with Placement of Surgical Mesh 

in Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence 

What to consider before choosing surgery -

Alternatives to the laparoscopic Burch and/or paravaginal repair procedures include the following:

  • do nothing and continue to experience the loss of urine
  • medical (non-surgical) treatment
  • lifestyle modification: quit smoking, lose weight, allergy treatment
  • Kegel’s exercise: regular contraction of the muscles that allow you to stop urine in mid-stream may reduce or eliminate incontinence
  • pessary use: usually a donut-shaped rubber or plastic device inserted into the vagina to support the bladder
  • hormonal (estrogen) replacement therapy
  • treatment with medication helps certain types of incontinence
  • other surgical procedures including
    • the so-called anterior repair (performed from a vaginal approach),
    • other procedures performed in the space between the bladder and pubic bone (may be done at laparoscopy or through a large incision at laparotomy),
    • sling procedures usually done with an incision in the vagina and a 1-2" incision at the pubic hairline,
    • collagen injection (injection of a natural glue-like substance into the bladder neck), and
    • InterStim® - a nerve stimulator is surgically placed to reduce bladder irritability

Many times using a combination of several forms of treatment results in the best treatment for incontinence and paravaginal defects (such as losing weight, stopping smoking, taking estrogen replacement, performing Kegel’s exercise, and having the Burch procedure). If you have any questions regarding the above or any aspect of the proposed surgery, be sure to discuss them with your physician. SOURCE

Request our prevention article

Read more -

How FDA Approved Mesh 

Graphic Courtesy of Patrick

Latest News on Device Approval from Congress, 13 December, 2011


how to get rid of algae said...

The FDA also said it was concerned about scientific studies that show a lack of clinical benefit from surgical mesh, compared to non-mesh repair.

pelvic mesh lawsuit said...

You got so many points here, that’s why I love reading your post. Thank you so much!

jony said...

I truly appreciate this site, continue the great work!
Good article, thanks for this very helpfull info..

Vaginal Mesh Lawyer said...

It's very insightful especially to women who wants to undergo surgery on vaginal mesh. Keep it up!